Day might the Zombie Apocalypse arrive on Xmas? You are able to bet on it! (Image: zombieapocalypse.com)
Every year punters place bets on whether or not they are going to awaken to a snowy blanket across their streets on Christmas morning. It’s the old romantic in each of us that dreams about this scenic backdrop to a joyous day, surrounded by our loved ones and overeating with the Christmas trimmings, cannibalizing and spreading our infectious zombie disease. Wait. What?
Betting on Zombies
Although some are wagering for a white Christmas time, UK bookmaking giant Ladbrokes is offering chances of 2000/1 on this yuletide being the beginning of the Zombie Apocalypse. That’s a good, festive idea to have, and beats the chances they offer for football team Crystal Palace winning the Premier League in 2010 at 5000/1. Explore harmful gambling.
‘We are quite confident that chances of the Zombie Apocalypse at 2000/1 are correct, and although the public should exert caution throughout the Christmas period, they should not be unduly concerned about the undead rising up to attack and consume the living,’ announced Alex Donohue, a spokesman for the Ladbrokes bookmaker.
Odds on a white xmas currently stand at 5/1, which is a much better chance than those offered on the doomsday coming of the undead, and you are more likely in order to claim your winnings after a little bit of snow instead of being forced to fight your way through the zombie hordes to collect your award. If you got that bet right, that’s for sure although you would be pretty smug with yourself.
While the possibility to bet on the Zombie Apocalypse is more than likely a bit that is nice of for Ladbrokes, Sean web Page zombie specialist and founder of this Ministry of Zombies has urged the public to prepare for the worst.
‘The public is obviously interested in the chances of a white Christmas time, nonetheless they should be more concerned by the increasing likelihood of the Zombie Apocalypse,’ reported Page, suggesting, possibly, that he is nipping at the whiskey having a bit alacrity that is too much.
‘The many likely time for an outbreak is through the busy yuletide season as people save money amount of time in large groups, rendering it easier for the zombie virus to spread, triggering the Apocalypse,’ Page included. Apparently, he’s seen it happen before.
Bets That Are Dead On
2000/1 seems a bit too low for the likelihood of a zombie epidemic really, but this is simply not the time that is first has offered the chance to place wagers on the Apocalypse, because they additionally offered equivalent chances in the outbreak of a undead siege on December 21st 2012, owing to all of the hype around the end of the Mayan calendar to which doomsday ‘enthusiasts’ were clinging hopefully in anticipation of these impending doom.
Strangely enough, Ladbrokes are also providing more likely odds of 500/1 on the chance for Prince Harry getting hitched to Miley Cyrus, but the smart money in this instance would probably be regarding the zombies, even though you know, end of the world and all that that you would be unlikely to recoup any wager due to the. So less ‘nothing was stirring’ and more ‘watch out for the bloodthirsty, flesh-eating undead outside the hinged door.’
MGM Clears Hurdles in Massachusetts; Gaming Commission Nevertheless Must Okay
MGM Resorts is almost through the regulatory gauntlet in Massachusetts for their Springfield casino project (Image: Artist’s rendering of casino)
Simply whenever you thought no body would ever be good enough for Massachusetts’ insanely fastidious gaming payment, the MGM actually earned their approbation this week. The commission’s investigative supply that could have its very own TV series called ‘MGC P.I.’ recommended that MGM Resorts be located suitable to move ahead with their Springfield casino task, with the caveat that MGM executives have the ability to talk their way away from a few lingering issues regarding the commission, concerns that came to light when the commission conducted its regulatory background check in the casino company.
Cleared for Remove
We aren’t whistling Dixie; the Bureau of Investigations and Enforcement spent the past 10 months looking through every speck of dust that anyone associated with MGM ever came across, and amazingly noted that they found nothing that would automatically disqualify the group from setting up house in the pristine state of Massachusetts when we say ‘lengthy.
But it is not really a done deal yet; the five Massachusetts Gaming Commissioners still get to have the word that is last whether or not MGM will likely be able to conduct business inside their neck associated with woods. But then be able to submit their last application as the one and only western Massachusetts casino license that will be given out; and since they’re the only remaining applicant, that would seem to be a pretty done deal if they give their papal blessing to the company, MGM will.
The only real tiny ding that the Bureau could dig up after almost a 12 months of searching all documented in a 500-page report on the topic was MGM’s method of dealing previous executive board member Terry Christensen, whom in 2008 was convicted on charges concerning the wiretapping of company mogul Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife when Kerkorian was included in a gruesome child help fight.
‘Despite their indictment, resignation through the Board and ultimate conviction, Christensen was permitted to engage, on a repeated and prolonged basis, in some delicate and non-public corporate issues of MGM Resorts … including their attendance at Board meetings,’ scolded the report.
In this dance of mea culpa, MGM CEO James Murren took the position of penitent profligate with all the Commission only at that week’s hearing, noting that it had been an error for the company to allow boy that is bad to continue in almost any capability with the business.
‘we exercised poor judgment,’ said Murren, who had previously been the outfit’s CFO when all this transpired. ‘It was an idea that is bad the very beginning. None of us should have had any contact with (Christensen).’
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.
More Executive Contrition
Murren ended up beingn’t alone to throw himself on the mercy of the court, as present MGM board member (and head of its review committee) Roland Hernandez produced point to inform commissioners that protocols are now in position in the business to ensure there will likely to be no repeats with this poor process that is decision-making.
All that has been then left for the commish to deal with had been a few concerns they had about some MGM transactions in Macau; mostly, these centered around a former partnership with Chinese company mogul (and daughter of casino mega-mogul Stanley Ho) Pansy Ho. Ho had been deemed unsuitable as someone during a 2010 nj-new Jersey hearing that is regulatory the situation, so that as such, MGM had to unload a 50 per cent stake in an Atlantic City casino there, just to keep their nose clean. The allegations were that Ho’s father Stanley had had transactions with some Chinese gangs, a definite ‘no-no’ in today’s regulatory video gaming universe.
Hernandez had to the Massachusetts commissioners that Ms. Ho had been included with MGM completely split from her father, and that she was mainly involved in non-gaming business tasks regarding their MGM Macau property. Hernandez also noted that other, less finicky, states had been fine with the Ho interaction; particularly, Nevada and Maryland, both of which had no nagging problem with it. He also noted that New Jersey has now softened their stance that is own may enable MGM back to the fold in Atlantic City.
The panel should rule later on this week; the commission’s chair Stephen Crosby won’t say which way the wind is blowing, but noted he appreciated the MGM execs’ openness in working with these issues.
But also being the only applicant and regardless if cleared by the commission this week, it is nevertheless maybe not a 100 % slam-dunk for MGM Resorts.
‘One applicant or 10, we will hold their feet to the fire to make sure we have application that is really good’ Crosby recommended reporters throughout a hearing break.
Setback for PokerStars as brand New Jersey Bars Licensing for Two Years
PokerStars got a smack from New Jersey regulators this when they put them in licensing limbo for the next two years week
If there is one name that has dominated the American on line poker market over the decade that is last it’s to be PokerStars. But if you’re living in nj-new jersey, you shouldn’t expect you’ll be playing on a site operated by the poker giant any right time quickly.
Two Years in Limbo
The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement made the decision this week to suspend the summary of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling permit for couple of years, effectively locking the company out from the state’s internet poker marketplace for that time period.
‘The Division of Gaming Enforcement has determined that the use of Rational Services Limited (PokerStars) casino solution industry licensure (CSIE) would be held in a suspended status for a period of two years,’ the Division stated in a declaration.
However, the door isn’t totally closed on PokerStars.
‘The Division, within that duration, may consider a request for relief to reactivate the application if significantly changed circumstances are demonstrated, of which time the Division’s research of PokerStars and its own affiliated entities and associated individuals will likely be resumed to evaluate suitability.’
Bad Company, Bad Actor
Although PokerStars has long settled its case with all the government and admitted no wrongdoing as part of that settlement New Jersey regulators still have some problems with the company. Chief among those appears to be founder Isai Scheinberg to their association, that has been under federal indictment since Ebony Friday. Scheinberg isn’t U.S. citizen, and has not come to the U.S. to face those charges, to no one’s surprise.
While this real-money-casino.club is a loss that is huge PokerStars, it also marks a huge win because of its competitors in the New Jersey market. As we reported recently, the site run by PartyPoker jointly with the Borgata Casino currently has a 50 percent share of the state’s poker market, with the Caesars/888 World variety of Poker site not far behind. Those two companies could effortlessly have been overshadowed by the PokerStars site which would have now been operated along with Resorts Casino and were hoping that their mind start would give them an advantage that will allow them to keep competitive. Now, they’ll have at least two years to develop brand loyalty, something that PokerStars may have a time that is difficult, if so when these are typically finally certified for brand New Jersey’s online marketplace.
PokerStars ended up being predictably not thrilled by the news, though they noted that the state’s decision could change in the near future.
‘Our company is disappointed that the N.J. Division of Gaming Enforcement has suspended the review of our application at this right time,’ said PokerStars spokesman Eric Hollreiser in a statement. ‘We note that the DGE will resume the review of our application if our circumstances change. We will remain in open dialogue with the DGE and can update them on alterations in our situation while they occur.’
This wasn’t the very first disappointing result for PokerStars in nj. Previously, the ongoing company had attempted to shop for the Atlantic Club Casino, only to have that deal break apart over questions about whether regulators would approve the purchase. That choice ended up being also costly, as PokerStars lost about $11 million they’d spent on casino expenses a total that was meant to be applied towards the eventual $15 million purchase price.