Few would accuse anybody of match fixing at Wimbledon, but many say that the practice is extensive among lower-ranked players at smaller events.
Tennis is confronted with accusations of match fixing for years: from the infamous match between Nikolay Davydenko and Martin Vassallo Arguello in 2007 that first introduced much of this public to questions concerning the integrity of matches in a few smaller tournaments to suspensions levied against two players earlier this year, there always appears to be something lurking under the sport’s surface.
Those concerns were aired once again this in a story by The Daily Beast, which once again attempted to delve through the information out there about tennis and figure out just how much of a problem match fixing planet oz 7 casino is for the sport week.
One 2014 study cited in that story estimated that one percent of all first-round tournament matches might be fixed, which will mean more than 20 matches a year were influenced by gamblers; other estimates and guesses have actually suggested that numerous matches each week could be fixed, though that’s nevertheless a very tiny percentage of all expert tennis matches.
Low Pay Leads to Temptation for Lower-Ranked Players
What makes tennis therefore susceptible to match fixing?
There are certainly a mix of factors, a lot of which help explain why the problem seems most prominent at the lower levels of this professional ranks.
First, there’s well-known fact that tennis (at least in singles play) is a sport that is individual.
There is certainly only one person that should be bribed to get them to throw a match (equivalent issue leading many to fear widespread integrity issues in boxing and other combat sports), and there are no teammates or substitutes to pick up the slack for a player who is struggling.
That said, nobody is accusing Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal of fixing matches at Wimbledon.
For just one, there’s the actual fact that these matches have a powerful quantity of scrutiny if it could be done at all on them; perhaps even more importantly, though, star tennis players are extremely well compensated, meaning it would cost anyone attempting to fix a match at that level an exorbitant amount of money.
That is not to say that nobody attempts. Even Novak Djokovic has told an account to be provided $100,000 to fix a match back in 2006.
But players on the Challenger Tour or other low-ranked competitors aren’t making nearly that much money, and may even lose cash in an offered tournament after travel and coaching expenses are taken under consideration.
Which makes them prime targets for gamblers trying to fix a match.
Spot Betting Allows Repairing Without Impacting Match Result
Another problem is the fact that gamblers don’t also have to fix an entire match to find ways to profit.
Because numerous gambling sites and bookmakers offer betting on sets or games that are even individual players can reach agreements to allow certain activities to occur at the right times to satisfy gamblers while still playing to win overall.
‘One particular typical fix would be to divide the first two sets to a predetermined script, then have fun with the third set fairly to determine which player advances,’ activities modeler Ian Dorward told Slate earlier this year.
The Tennis Integrity device may be the body tasked with rooting out such dilemmas, and they have often made examples of players. In March, Elie Rousset and Walkter Trusendi each received six-month suspensions and fines for violations of anti-corruption guidelines, though perhaps not for match-fixing.
But no matter what the Integrity Unit does, it is not likely in order to change the culture enabling lower-ranked players to be incentivized to aid gamblers who want to make bets that are sure.
That would need a change that is complete how compensation works up and down the various levels of expert tennis, a thing that probably will not take place any moment quickly.
New Jersey Online DDoS Attacks on Regulated Sites Arrive with Bitcoin Ransom Notes
Recent New Jersey DDoS attacks on unnamed regulated web sites had been along with a ransom note future that is promising more serious assaults should businesses not comply. (Image: rodin.com.au)
DDoS (distributed denial of service) isn’t reality that any online gaming company ever would like to cope with, but some regulated New Jersey sites had to do just that the other day.
New Jersey’s fledgling online gambling industry has been targeted, apparently for the time that is first by these distributed attacks.
Late week that is last at least four unnamed web sites were derailed by a hacker, or hackers, who flooded the web sites’ bandwidths with traffic, rendering them inoperable, and ultimately using them offline for around half an hour.
The attacks were accompanied by a ransom note for an undisclosed sum, payable in Bitcoin, with a threat of a more serious attack to follow.
Perhaps Not Brand New, But Frustrating
DDoS attacks are nothing new for the online gambling industry, of course. In fact, they’re as old as the industry itself, but there are suggestions that incidents of this unwanted actions have been growing. Some experts even claim that attacks across all industries that are online doubled in 2014.
High-profile operators in the receiving end last year included Betfair, which was targeted on Grand National time, the biggest UK horse race meet associated with the year in terms of betting.
Attackers usually time their efforts to coincide with large sporting events in the hope that operators will simply pay up rather than lose company. PokerStars, Unibet, and Swedish state gambling monopoly Svenska Spel are also all recent victims.
Chances of Prosecution Slim
Despite the initial interruption, it appears that the problem is now stable and has been effortlessly dealt with by the nj-new Jersey market’s cybersecurity teams. The battle between online gambling sites while the hackers is one of pet and mouse, of strategy and counterstrategy: as safety technology improves, so do the hackers’ efforts to breach it.
New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement President David Rebuck said this that the matter was now being investigated by state police, the FBI, and the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, as well as his own organization week. The agencies that are various he said, were hunting a ‘known actor’ who had ‘done this before.’
Chances of prosecution are slim, nevertheless. Up to now, only two men have been convicted for launching DDoS attacks. Those were two UK-based Poles who made the error of threatening an operator they knew personally and agreeing to meet him in a hotel room. The operator, of program, brought the police with him. In 2013, the hapless pair were sentenced to five years in prison by a court in the united kingdom.
Such attacks are not limited to online gambling, of course. In February 2014, Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVS), owned by anti-online curmudgeon Sheldon Adelson, had been put through a massive cyber attack that was believed to possess emanated from Iran. On February 10, LVS was plunged into chaos as computers began flatlining and servers shutting down. Hard drives were wiped clean as malware ripped through the organization’s networks.
As hackers began compressing and downloading batches of painful and sensitive files, comprising everything from high-roller credit checks to information on global computer systems, the decision was taken up to sever the multibillion dollar operation entirely from the web.
The attack caused an estimated $20 million worth of damage. The attackers subsequently claimed their DDoS actions had been been encouraged after hearing remarks made by Adelson in 2013 about ‘dropping the bomb’ on Iran.
NY Casino License Bidding Process Receives One Applicant
Tiago Downs, the bidder that is sole the fourth NY casino license, proposes an improved expansion package having unsuccessful to impress last December. (Image: weny.com)
Regulators in nyc State have slim pickings if they come to determine on the winner associated with Upstate that is fourth casino in the economically deprived Southern Tier region.
Just one contender submitted a proposal for Monday’s deadline, while a rival pulled out at the final minute.
The Tioga Downs racino in Nichols is the one and only applicant for the certain area, with a $195 million expansion proposition to its present center.
The aborted proposal, from businessman Jeffrey C. Hyman, was pulled having been dealt ‘a fatal blow’ by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation.
Hyman said his project would have been ‘seismic,’ which might have been what the ecological individuals were complaining about in the place that is first particularly when you consider there is an ongoing debate about fracking in the area.
Unfortunately, Jeff Gural, owner of Tioga Downs, did not impress the Gaming Control Board at the first licensing hearing with his task in December 2014, although he has since come up with an package that is improved.
In those days, the board suggested three casino licenses, for Monticello, in the Catskills; Schenectady; and the Finger Lakes area, snubbing the Southern Tier and Tioga Downs totally, despite having been issued the powers to suggest a license that is fourth.
Gural was furious at the decision and highly critical of the board. He argued that a casino in the Southern Tier would be completely rational, as the closest competitor is Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, 90 miles south in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
‘It’s got nothing doing I have enough money,’ he fumed with me. ‘But the folks of the Southern Tier?’
‘And what really pisses me down,’ he continued, warming to his theme, ‘is the governor asked me personally to invest $800,000 of my money to pass law that is local, Proposition One [on the expansion of casino gaming]. What was that all about? I mean… the thing that is whole sickening in all honesty with you.’
Such had been the outcry among locals, in fact, that Governor Andrew Cuomo intervened, requesting that the Gaming Commission reconsider.
‘As this is the final license issued in New York State, it could excite national competition by interested parties that submit better still applications than the very first round,’ suggested Cuomo. ‘ If you agree for this request, the [casino board] should quickly establish an activity for the license that is fourth could be complete as expeditiously as possible, as the Southern Tier needs jobs and investment now.’
The board complied, a decision it might probably now regret, as it finds itself facing a ‘bidding war’ of one and under political stress to award a license to a man who may have already been highly critical of its decision making processes.