Asian solamente feminine travellers are challenged by gendered and racialised dangers.
Gender intersects with competition in amplifying women that are asian perception of danger.
Dangers are conceptualised whilst the unequal power relations tourism space that is underlying.
Feminine travellers gain reconstruct and empowerment identities through risk-taking.
Individual empowerment may expand to social transformations at a level that is micro.
This study explores how Asian women perceive and negotiate the risks of travelling alone and the meanings of these processes in response to the emergence of the solo female travel market in Asia. The lived experiences of 35 solo feminine travellers from 10 East and Southeast parts of asia were analysed using constructivist grounded concept. The findings expose that Asian solamente travellers that are female worried about gendered ( e.g. Intimate attack and street harassment) and racialised (e.g. Discrimination and social disapproval) risks, which imply the unequal energy relations underpinning the gendered and tourism space that is racialised. The findings additionally expose proof where sex intersects with battle in amplifying and constructing women that are asian perception of danger. The research demonstrates how Asian solo feminine travellers gained empowerment and experienced self-transformations through negotiating the potential risks and additional reveals exactly just just how these specific transformations may extend to social transformations at a micro level within an context that is asian.
Past article in problem
Next article in problem
Dr Elaine Chiao Ling Yang is a co-employee Lecture into the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management, Griffith University. She holds a PhD in Tourism from Griffith University. Elaine’s research interest is based on the regions of Asian tourism, feminine travellers and tourist danger perception. Her works have now been posted in Tourism Management, Journal of Travel Research, Current Issues in Tourism, and Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management. Elaine is a board that is editorial of Tourism Management views and Annals of Leisure analysis. This woman is additionally a volunteer administrator of Women Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Share: Elaine Yang contributed towards the conception and design regarding the task, literature review, data collection, analysis and interpretation of information, drawing implications and summary, drafting and revising the manuscript, addressing reviewers’ reviews and communication with all the log.
Dr Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore is really A lecturer that is senior at University, Australia. Catheryletter’s research interest is on tourist and visitor behavior, with a separate give attention to females, families and small children as well as on understanding these segments from A asian viewpoint. Catheryn has co-published two publications: Asian Genders in Tourism and ladies and Travel. Catheryn is Editor-in-Chief of Tourism Management views and serves in the editorial panels of various other tourism and hospitality journals. She actually is 2nd Vice-Chair of this Council for Australasian Tourism and Hospitality Education (CAUTHE). She actually is also the chair and founder of females Academics in Tourism (WAiT).
Contribution: Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore contributed intellectual input into the entire task including methodology and literature review, and subsequent critical revisions of numerous drafts associated with manuscript.
Associate Professor Charles Arcodia may be the Deputy Head for the Department of Tourism, Sport and resort Management at Griffith University, Australia. Charles’s research passions are usually in the area of event management and explore several associated areas such as for instance tourism administration training and heritage management that is cultural. He’s also the Executive Editor of this Global Journal of Event Management Research and it is an editorial board user of five other scholarly journals.
Share: Charles Arcodia contributed to your conception and design associated with research; the interpretation associated with information therefore the conclusions drawn as a result; reviews associated with the draft paper; and interpretation of this reviewers’ feedback, and reaction to the reviewers.